bortezomib
bortezomib: 57 clinical trials tracked.
bortezomib evidence translation
What we can confirm
57 tracked trials
What it means
What to watch
Prepared research question
What is verified about bortezomib, and what remains unknown?
Traceable citations · Unknowns marked
See linked entities and source evidence7 indications · 13 study sponsors
Related indications
Clinical Trials (57)showing 10 most recent
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etentamig (ABBV-383) Compared to Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
Primary endpoint: Number of Participants With Adverse Events
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Ramantamig Plus Daratumumab Versus Investigator's Choice of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) or Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma for Whom Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant is Not Planned as Initial Therapy
Primary endpoint: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
A Phase 2/3 Randomized Trial Investigating Daratumumab on a Modified Augmented BFM (aBFM) Backbone in Newly Diagnosed T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LL)
Primary endpoint: Event-free survival (EFS) in patients with newly diagnosed T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)
ELDORADO: a Randomized Phase II Trial of Elranatamab or Daratumumab in Combination With Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVd Lite) in Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Ineligible/Deferred Multiple Myeloma
Primary endpoint: Proportion Patients who test Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at 10^-5 after 4 Treatment Cycles
An Attenuated Schedule Dara-RVd Induction for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
Primary endpoint: The rate of achievement of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity
Phase III Open-Label, Randomised Study of Consolidation With AZD0120 (Dual-Targeting BCMA/CD19 CAR-T) vs Continuous Standard Therapy in NDMM Patients Ineligible for ASCT as Initial Therapy (DURGA-5)
Primary endpoint: PFS in NDMM who are ineligible to receive ASCT is measured to demonstrate the superiority of IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by AZD0120 compared to IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by continuous DRd or IsaRd.
Determination 2 - Isatuximab, Iberdomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Induction, Followed by Risk- and Response-Adapted Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy, in Transplant-Eligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Primary endpoint: 3-Year Sustained Minimal Residual Disease (sMRD)-negative Complete Response (CR) Rate [Cohort 1] (Step 2)
A Phase 2/3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Linvoseltamab, Bortezomib and Lenalidomide (Linvo-VR) With and Without Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Vs Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DVRd) in Transplant-Eligible Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Primary endpoint: Occurrence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A Phase III Open-label, Randomised, Multicentre Study Comparing AZD0120, a Dual-Targeting Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Therapy Directed Against BCMA and CD19, Versus Standard Regimens in Participants With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Primary endpoint: To demonstrate the superiority of AZD0120 relative to standard therapy (DKd, DPd, PVd, or Kd) by assessment of PFS in participants with RRMM.
An Open-Label, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Linvoseltamab Monotherapy and Linvoseltamab Plus Carfilzomib Versus Standard of Care Combination Regimens in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Primary endpoint: Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)